Okay, it's catch-up time.
Week 56: February 1st, 2009.
Winner: Peaceloverainbow
TQ: When writing a classic character/story in a modern setting what can be gained or lost in translation?
I'm not too sure since I've never done something like that, but from reading things about that (AU Star Trek fics - don't ask), a lot can be gained (and lost).
Introspect into the character and how they would fare in the modern world is definitely something that can be gained. It's entertaining, especially if it's written well and in-character. That could be difficult for some, though - I once read this fic where Spock was in our world and half the time it was out of character, but it was a joy to read.
In-characterness can be kidnapped, killed, tied up in a bag, and thrown in a river with classic stories/characters being set in modern times. It doesn't happen all the time, but normally, when I see something like "Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde retold in modern times", I usually expect things being totally OOC and just being bad.
Also, some people tend to have the mind-set of "Oh, God, this is gonna suck," when reading a story about a classic set in modern times. And most of the time they're right, but not always. That kind of thinking makes it too hard for people to actually enjoy the story, and I will admit I had something of that mindset when I clicked the link for this (It went away as soon as I read the first chapter, though =)).
Sometimes, people don't want to see their classic stories being ruined by this and some even avoid them like the plague. They're prejudiced against it because they either a) don't want to see their classics ruined or b) can't imagine something like that and find it hard to relate to the characters anymore.
Week 57: February 8th, 2009
Winner Giorgia
TQ: Tell me about Mary Sue and her twin brother Gary Stu. Be volitile. Be passionate. Be down right cruel! What is a Mary Sue or Gary Stu? What defines them? What are major flags that one's coming up? Are they ever beneficial to the story?
Mary Sue: In agreement (mostly) with PLR, but there's a few different things that make a Mary Sue. Firstly, there's the evil thing of putting oneself into one's story. Which, I am going to say, is a vile thing to do. It just makes me think, "No, you idiot, you are not that important, you do not have the solutions to everything, and it is very sad to want fictional characters to like you." I think it's like writing FF for bands.
"And I/she was at a My Chemical Romance concert, and [insert lead singer's name here] came off the stange and took me/her back into his dressing room, and he fell in love with me/her and it was the best kiss ever. We/they made out for, like, hours."
*Shudder*
It's just wrong.
But then there's the more fantasy genre Mary Sue. (Try out this link; it's awesome fun. I couldn't stop laughing.)
Then there's the combination of the prior definition and proper fanfiction. There's this thing that people (almost always teenagers) do that drives me absolutely insane. It is taking thirty-something year old characters and making them like high school students. Or actually making them high school students. And I don't mean AU they-met-in-senior-year. I mean...
I read an Alias fic a while ago that was horrible. It was basically, "Sydney, Vaughn, Weiss: undercover in a high school for a few weeks. Make friends, lose friends, get angsty about said lost friends, groan about doing homework and OMG, Weiss falls in love!" With a high school student.
Okay, so. If you can't relate to a thirty year old, you probably shouldn't be watching the show, let along caring about the characters, and don't drag them down to your level. Channeling your own emotions into a adult like that (with so much experience, very worldly, etc.) is just a little sad. So basically, it's making an already-established character a Mary Sue. Which is, essentially, just bad FF.
But I'm getting a little off-topic.
Gary Stu. I actually haven't heeard that before. But, again, I agree with PLR. It's pretty much just the author's idea of The Perfect Man. The perfect but entirely cliched man, really. The man who is usually suave, funny, angsty, hot-as-hell-fire, etc.
I agree with Luis being a Mary Stu. Anne Rice's characters all are. Well, the male ones anyhow. But, in thier defense, they have the excuse of Anee Rice's weird obsession with not only androgyny, but free-love. You know? Like, after Lestat kills his mother, she's almost like his lover. All their lines of love and gender and such are entirely blurred.
That, and she was probably one of the very first people to create a legitimate and popular Mary Stu.
I think that if they're written well, and aren't of the criteria of I'm-living-vicariously-through-my-characters-because-I'm-awesome, then they can be beneficial. Otherwise they wouldn't be such cliches. I mean, cliches are cliches for a reason, right? They obviously have to have been enough uses and users for them to become so popular in the first place.
If it's the other, less obvious kind, and there's a reason for them to be there, then yeah. Like... Like when you need a character to be everything that is the opposite of another; or a character to mock because they are such a stereotype; or an established character's latest lover (who you don't ship).
As in:
Ship One: "Why don't you be with them? They are so perfect, they can give you everything, I can give you nothing... you deserve better than me."
*Angsty sigh*
Ship Two/One with Mary Sue lover: "Because I want you! They're perfect, but I love you."
I'm rather scathing today, aren't I? How depressing. Hehe. Well, the TQ requested down right cruelty. I could probably run on for a few more... pages... but I'm going to stop.
I like this TQ! It's a lot of fun...
But I'll shut up before I fun myself out. There are fireworks on tonight! Oooh. Pretty.
Week 58: February 16th, 2009
Winner: Zelda49
TQ: How is writing the aftermath of a character death (or other tragic event) that actually happened in the verse of the show different/harder/easier than writing the aftermath of such an event in a fanfiction verse?
There are two sides to my answer this week. On one hand, the writer is more confined when dealing with any event that occurs on the show because s/he has to stick to the script—literally. When writing a tragedy of your own creation you can set the scene any way you want to, kill/maim/injure/etc. whoever you want to, and in whatever way suits your needs. But when dealing with something that has been shown, certain aspects of the scene are unchangeable, forcing you to work around them. That, of course, is the second part of my answer: forcing an author into a specific set of circumstances gives him/her the opportunity to do things the show writers didn’t do, or didn’t think of, or to put a different spin on things. You can focus on a specific character, extend the scene, show the aftermath, express thoughts left unspoken in the episode, etc.
Week 59: February 22nd, 2009
Winner: happyharper17
TQ: How can the way you conduct yourself as a writer affect the readership of your piece? That is will you have a greater number of happy readers if you honor promises to them, update promptly, and go out of your way to read and review other people's work? Or will a good story speak well enough for itself?
To the TQ, I think it can make a tremendous difference, especially in terms of building up general reader loyalty. When I read a story by a writer who goes out of his or her (but almost always her) way to review, reply to reviews, update regularly and generally be considerate and kind toward readers, I always feel so much more of a duty to review.
In general, I pretty much only browse stories with Greg, Riley or Ray, but two of my current favorite stories don't star any of the three. I probably never would have given these stories a chance because they weren't listed as having Greg, Riley or Ray as a main character, but their authors both reviewed my stories quite regularly. I promised that I would review stories of writers who reviewed mine, so I went off to check theirs out and, lo and behold, they were wonderful. In general, authors that go out of their way to review other stories are definitely more likely to be rewarded (or, IMO, should be more likely to be rewarded) with reviews of their own.
As to regular updates and following through on promises, I think it depends. It definitely does contribute toward my respect and trust in the writer over an extended period of time. One of my favorite writers of all time just about always updates every one to two days, and this (as well as the stellar writing) makes me appreciate her as a writer more.
That said, I honestly don't know if it helps bring in more reviews or make happier readers. While I absolutely love and appreciate when authors update regularly and honor promises, if a story is a good story, then I'm still going to love it, and, by connection, love its author, regardless. I also have seen stories that don't get updated for a month, or even years, that manage to accumulate a lot of reviews in the meantime. (These are stories that generally seem to promise a great deal of angst.) While I love that the authors finally update, I wish they would do so sooner.
Personally, I remember one of my betas telling me when I was working on my first story how it's a good idea to update regularly just so readers will get used to seeing your story on the 'Just Updated' list on FFnet and, eventually, will give it a try.
I've definitely gotten comments from readers saying how much they appreciate that I update regularly. I've also heard (and agree) that, with mysteries and other stories where you have to keep track of a lot of details, it really helps to update regularly. I honestly don't know how my story would work if I waited a month between updates, because my readers would probably forget about or lose track of certain details.
Overall, I guess I think that it's just good to be courteous. I think the best way to look at how an writer treats their readers and fellow writers is through the Golden Rule: Treat others the way you want to be treated. So if you want people to review your stories and if you want the stories you read to be updated frequently and to have promises in them honored, then you should do the same for other readers and authors.
Week 60: March 1st, 2009
Winner: Zelda49
TQ: How often do you think it's appropriate and/or advantageous to switch between different characters' perspectives within a story? Within a scene? Within a chapter?
"Switching perspectives" seems like a phrase that is defined by each person individually. Case in point, I once had a reviewer who told me that with a little practice I would learn to write in just one perspective (this was just last year), but 1) I couldn't figure out why switching POVs would be a bad thing and 2) I wrote the story in question in the third person, and just added in the characters' thoughts occasionally. So my definition of perspective is basically point of view--writing through the character's eyes and in their voice.
If we go with that definition, I don't switch perspectives much at all. I like to write in the third person (most of the time). When I do branch out it's into first person, and I usually stay with just one character's POV because it helps me stay consistant. If I start jumping around all over the place I'll get lost, and if I'm lost then my poor reader has no hope.
If we loosen the definition a little to include things like adding in a character's thoughts or feelings, then I switch perspectives all the time, in a story, a chapter, a paragraph. But I don't think of it as a problem, or even as "switching". I think of it as layering in detail, giving the reader a glimpse of what I think is inside that character's head at that moment. So I guess what I'm saying is that perspective, like so many other parts of writing, is really up to the author. But I would suggest that major changes be kept to a minimum and/or be clearly deliniated so that the reader knows whose eyes they were seeing through.
That's my two cents for the week. Can't wait to see what y'all think of Turn the Page. I'm also soliciting suggestions for the last couple of chapters--I've forgotten how I originally wanted to end the story, and am in need of some inspiration.
Week 61: March 8th, 2009
Winner: Everyone - you guys seriously went to town this week!
TQ: Pick a character from you favorite fandom and write about their history. Who are some of their most significant friends? Their family? Non-friend people who have impacted them? Pets? Tell us everything you know about them. Things you know from being familliar with the fandom and things that you have decided are facts about their life.
Week 62: March 15th, 2009
Winner: racefh
TQ: How can basing a relationship in fanfiction or writing in general loosely on one you've had yourself benefit or diminish the dynamic of the story?
I think basing relationships on real-life makes the story feel more real. It makes it seem more relate-able, because it's something that's really going on. And I think it enhances the story when there is a real element to it.
Week 63: March 22nd, 2009
Winner: Giorgia
TQ: How do you decide what's the end to your story? Is it by design from the beginning, or is it
something you feel from the course of the story? Does the length go into your decision? What makes you decide the story's over?
Hehe. My favourite topic.
Well, usually, it's one extreme or the other. I either find the ending is one of the very first things to come to me (and I work backwards from three), or it takes me forever to get it right. Often I end up still not really liking it, but I usually won't post it until I'm at the very least satisfied.
Chapter stories can be much easier, too. If you have any sort of outline (even a mental one) it is easier to know where you want to cut off. Then all that's left to do is figure out exactly how to cut it off.
I think I usually know pretty well when a story is over. I mean, you strive for the ending, right? Well, maybe not 'strive', but my point is that I'm of the mind that if I'm not satisfied with it, or if I feel the need to continue, or if there's still something I want to get across that I perhaps haven't done yet, then it's essentially unfinished.
I also think that an audience knows when a story should finish, even if there are... discrepancies. As in: I like this, write another chapter. Or: The ending was rushed. Etc.
Still, though, there are some stroeis in which I write simply to write, and don't really think about the ending at all until I get there.
